Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68746 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2004 20:57:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Aug 2004 20:57:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 5420 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2004 20:56:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 5288 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2004 20:55:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 5180 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2004 20:55:56 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [206.190.38.68] (HELO web50403.mail.yahoo.com) (206.190.38.68) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with SMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:55:53 -0700 Message-ID: <20040818205551.17489.qmail@web50403.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.80.49.7] by web50403.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:55:51 PDT Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:55:51 -0700 (PDT) From: David Graham Subject: Re: [DBUtils] Oracle 9.2.0 JDBC Timestamp Problem To: Jakarta Commons Developers List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This change makes sense in DbUtils because we're already explicitly calling ResultSet.get* methods for other types. It doesn't hurt to add getTimestamp() to that list. All concrete implementations of JDBC interfaces were removed from DbUtils because of incompatibilities between JDK versions. We replaced them with the ProxyFactory class which allows you to build dynamic wrappers. David --- Henri Yandell wrote: > > setObject is also quite screwed, and setTimestamp used to do some weird > stuff in Oracle 9, unsure about their new driver. > > My planned solution to this was to create a specific wrapper driver for > Oracle that fixes Oracle's bugs, rather than put the fixes into things > like dbutils. > > Need to find that code again. DbUtils used to have an 'extended' driver > concept that you could extend and put fixes like this in, but JDBC 2 vs > 3 > made it get taken out of DbUtils I think. > > Not a negative to the patch by the way, just an info dump having seen > this > problem before. > > Hen > > On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, David Graham wrote: > > > Thanks for finding this! It would be best to open a bugzilla ticket > so > > the issue isn't lost or forgotten. > > > > Thanks, > > David > > > > --- Rolf Moser wrote: > > > > > Hello > > > > > > I just run into a Timestamp problem with the Oracle 9i (9.2.0) JDBC > > > Driver > > > When calling rs.getObject(index) on a DB field, defined as > Timestamp(6), > > > > > > the resulting object is a oracle.sql.TIMESTAMP and not a > > > java.sql.Timestamp as with other JDBC Drivers. This leads to a null > > > value propagation if your Bean Property is defined as > > > java.sql.Timestamp. > > > > > > If calling rs.getTimestamp(index), Oracle correctly converts the > > > resulting value to a java.sql.Timestamp object. > > > > > > I looked at the current source and added the following statement to > the > > > BeanProcessor processColumn Method as a workaround: > > > > > > } else if(propType.equals(Timestamp.class)) { > > > return rs.getTimestamp(index); > > > > > > This ensures that for a Bean property of type java.sql.Timestamp the > > > getTimestamp() method is called. > > > Otherwise the default getObject() mehod is called, so there souldn't > be > > > a problem if someone wants the Oracle enhanced oracle.sql.TIMESTAMP > > > object. > > > > > > Regards > > > Rolf > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org