commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kirk Lund <>
Subject RE: [Modeler] objectReference to ObjectReference
Date Fri, 06 Aug 2004 20:22:58 GMT
Thanks for taking the time to respond, and for scolding me nicely 
:).  Sorry about posting to commons-cvs... I meant to post to commons-dev 
and simply copied the address from the wrong email.

I'll read up on Bugzilla and report the bug.


At 02:08 PM 8/6/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>First of all, please use commons-dev@jakarta rather than
>commons-cvs@jakarta for this question.
>Enhancements should be submitted in .diff format to Bugzilla at
>  See more guidelines at
>You're right that Modeler isn't very active at the moment.  It's used
>fairly widely though, mostly through Tomcat which depends on it.  So we
>take patch submissions for Modeler seriously and they are committed.
>Use the standard Bugzilla approach please, rather than sending personal
>emails to any committers.  And use commons-dev@jakarta to discuss ideas,
>proposals, changes, etc.
>As for ObjectReference being of the wrong case: submit that as a bug in
>Bugzilla please.  Thanks,
>Yoav Shapira
>Millennium Research Informatics
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Kirk Lund []
> >Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 1:58 PM
> >To:
> >Subject: [Modeler] objectReference to ObjectReference
> >
> >I'd like to propose the following change to
> >org.apache.commons.modeler.ManagedBean...
> >
> >We are using MX4J with Modeler and decided to use instances of
> > instead of
> >org.apache.commons.modeler.BaseModelMBean.
> >
> >MX4J's implementation enforces the use of "ObjectReference" as it's
> >supported managed resource type.  This enforcement includes the case of
> >string.  Modeler's ManagedBean uses "objectReference" (line 391), and
> >MX4J's RequiredModelMBean rejects it, throwing an Exception.
> >
> >Page 88 of the JMX spec specifies "ObjectReference" as the proper case
> >be used.  Should I send an email to this group with the changed
> > attached?
> >
> >Modeler doesn't seem very active at present.  I'd also like to sweep
> >through the src code, adding in javadocs, formatting changes, and
> >cleanup.  Unless someone else is already doing this?  If not, then
>should I
> >attach the code to emails I send to this list or directly to a
> >committer?  Sorry for all the questions but I'm not sure how everyone
> >involved would prefer this, esp. since "jakarta-commons" spans so many
> >sub-projects.
> >
> >Kirk Lund
> >GemStone Systems, Inc.
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >For additional commands, e-mail:
>This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business 
>communication, and may contain information that is confidential, 
>proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the 
>individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, 
>printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) 
>intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your 
>computer system and notify the sender.  Thank you.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message