Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80921 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 14:55:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 14:55:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 39570 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2004 14:55:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 39528 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2004 14:55:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 39503 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2004 14:55:38 -0000 Received: from [205.152.59.69] (HELO imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net) (205.152.59.69) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 07:55:38 -0700 Received: from [172.16.1.7] ([68.218.226.87]) by imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040611145527.XVOB1408.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[172.16.1.7]> for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:55:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [testutils] Is there any commons area for generic test code? From: Alex Karasulu To: Jakarta Commons Developers List In-Reply-To: <20040611054722.X19347@minotaur.apache.org> References: <1086794723.17881.2933.camel@newton> <20040611054722.X19347@minotaur.apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1086965717.17881.3274.camel@newton> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:55:17 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 08:53, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Alex Karasulu wrote: > > > Is there a place where we can collect and localize utility methods and > > classes used for unit testing? I have not found anything yet. > > > > Is it even worth doing this? > > > > If the answer is "no", then "yes" to the two questions above, is it > > worth creating a sandbox area where we can start gathering useful > > utilities for unit testing? > > The existing sandbox project JUX > (http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-commons-sandbox/jux/) was > created for a simliar purpose, although it looks like someone has removed > its web prescence. The code there has gone stagnant but is still works as > well as ever. Doh! I wish I knew about this earlier. > Also, someone once contacted me about a simliar and apparently > larger project on sourceforge, although I can't find it now, junit > add-ons or something like that. Yeah I saw Pete's post about that too. Here was the response to that one: http://baywhape.notlong.com I looked at JUX just now and saw that you have one class there called ObjectTestCase.java. Would you rather move the stuff already put into test to JUX or just add this class to the test project? Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org