commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "matthew.hawthorne" <ma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [lang] MutableXxx Was: [Jakarta Commons Wiki] New: MutableNumbers
Date Sat, 05 Jun 2004 01:51:55 GMT
So, should I commit what I have into lang.mutable, and we can go from 
there?
I have all of the Number types complete, with some decent tests.

This way, anyone who's interested can take a look and make improvements.




Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> From: "Henri Yandell" <bayard@generationjava.com>
> 
>>1 lang.mutable gets my vote.
> 
> +1
> 
> 
>>2 MutableXxx gets my vote as a naming scheme.
> 
> +1
> 
> 
>>3 I'm in favour of MutableXxx having instance links to XxxUtils to make
>>them more powerful [and delegating calls to all Xxx methods]. This does
>>make it a large lump of work though.
> 
> -0 for v2.1, +0 after
> 
> 
>>4 Do we need MutableInteger, MutableFloat etc, or can we just normalize on
>>the main ones?
> 
> I think we need them all, as casting the get() is a pain otherwise.
> 
> Stephen


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message