commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Hoegg <rho...@isisnetworks.net>
Subject Re: [all] Instead of source and binary - one distribution
Date Fri, 04 Jun 2004 21:22:30 GMT
Well a lot of times a commons component is a transitive dependency for a 
project.  I know I've never looked at the beanutils source but I have to 
have it for my struts projects.
Also, jars in the public maven repositories should probably stay slim.

--
Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks
http://www.isisnetworks.net/

Tim O'Brien wrote:

>We make releases both source and binary, but why not just start cutting one
>release?  I can understand why a product like HTTPD would be distributed
>without source, but the commons community consists of developers.
>
>Can anyone think of any good reason to preserve the current release
>structure.
>
>My apologizes in advance if this starts an endless flame war.  I have a
>knack for that.
>
>-----
>Tim O'Brien
>tobrien@discursive.com
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>  
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message