Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Message-ID: <4089DFF7.9000705@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 20:33:11 -0700
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <craigmcc@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20031111
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [collections] Size and scope issues
References: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0404221535410.11129-100000@shell3.shore.net>
 <20686624-9496-11D8-8A5B-000393DB559A@coredevelopers.net>
In-Reply-To: <20686624-9496-11D8-8A5B-000393DB559A@coredevelopers.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dain Sundstrom wrote:

> On Apr 22, 2004, at 2:40 PM, Michael Heuer wrote:
>
>> Perhaps some of the classes in [collections] could be presented as a JSR
>> for inclusion in the JDK at some later date.  That might cut the size of
>> the jar some.  :)
>
>
> All kidding aside, I like this idea.  How about starting by splitting 
> collections into, really common collections, and the rarely used 
> collections.


A neat ideal, but perceptions of "really common" versus "rarely used" 
seem to be awfully personal.  Kinda reminds me of earlier commons-dev 
discussions trying to create a "commons core" JAR that included all of 
the "really common" commons JARs, and none of the others.  Needless to 
say, there was no consensus on what the contents should be :-).

>
> -dain

Craig McClanahan


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org