commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Shapira, Yoav" <>
Subject RE: [logging][PROPOSAL] a solution to incompatibility between log4j versions
Date Wed, 19 May 2004 18:27:26 GMT


>That said, it is an interesting challenge -- aligning the projects is
>aligning the stars -- and good inter-project communications (tough in
>are critical to this. I don't know if the Java language allowed the
>class/methods to be marked as deprecated, 'cos I'm sure compiler
>would have moved things along. 

I like the stars analogy ;)  I'm not sure what you mean by the rest of
the paragraph: Java does allow methods and classes to be deprecated,
log4j has marked them as deprecated, and Java does generate compile-time
warnings by default if your classes use deprecated code (and javac gives
you full details if you add -deprecation to its commands).  People using
Priority or Category directly have been getting deprecation warnings
every time they compile their code for years now.


This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may
contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended
only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed,
disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately
delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender.  Thank you.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message