commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Shapira, Yoav" <Yoav.Shap...@mpi.com>
Subject RE: [general] improvements to the charter
Date Mon, 17 May 2004 12:42:09 GMT

Hi,
Your suggested removals sound fine to me ;)

Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Henri Yandell [mailto:bayard@generationjava.com]
>Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 11:34 AM
>To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
>Subject: Re: [general] improvements to the charter
>
>
>Agreed. I'll add them to my removal vote.
>
>Hen
>
>On Sat, 15 May 2004, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>
>> The second two sentences of 1.5.1 are also not a true representation
of
>real
>> life.
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Henri Yandell" <bayard@generationjava.com>
>> > [hopefully all these general emails won't mean that only one turns
into
>a
>> > living thread]
>> >
>> > I'd like to try and get us moving forward on the Commons charter a
bit.
>> > It's easy to turn this into a long series of misunderstood
arguments,
>so
>> > my first suggestion is hopefully something very unargumentative.
>> >
>> > [cf http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/charter.html]
>> >
>> > I'm proposing that we:
>> >
>> > **
>> > Remove (1.5.2) as it has never happened and is nothing our
community is
>> > striving to make happen. This also involves a FAQ entry on the
>directory
>> > being removed.
>> >
>> > Remove (2) as this is not relevant to the charter nowadays, plus
it's
>not
>> > even an accurate representation of the original components. If this
>> > information is deemed useful, we need to ask Craig to give us
another
>> > history lesson and make some notes, probably elsewhere.
>> >
>> > Remove (3) as it is no longer relevant and should be documented in
an
>> > available resources section. [ie) can a new Commons component use
JIRA,
>> > where is our wiki etc].
>> > **
>> >
>> > I don't believe any of these are too big a deal and getting things
>moving
>> > will give us a foundation for future discussions. I think that a
>typical 3
>> > +1 and no -1 vote should be fine for such a thing [unless anyone
knows
>of
>> > obscure rules], and will plan to send out such a vote on the above
if
>no
>> > discussion occurs.
>> >
>> > Hen
>> >
>> >
>> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail:
commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may
contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended
only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed,
disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately
delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender.  Thank you.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message