commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From robert burrell donkin <>
Subject Re: [collections] Size and scope issues
Date Mon, 03 May 2004 22:35:47 GMT
On 3 May 2004, at 16:12, Dain Sundstrom wrote:


> Instead of just bitching, I'll suggest a possible solution.  Pick 
> someone in your project who understands the issues, has shown an 
> interest in these problems, and give them the authority to make 
> decisions.  I know it is not very "Apache", but I believe it will 
> work.

i know that i've said it before but i'm not really convinced that this 
is so much an authority issue as an awareness/motivation issue. if 
there are good and well-known reasons why small footprint distributions 
are required, then i'd say that it's unlikely anyone would veto the 
creation of extra build targets for more modular distributions as well 
as the current monolithic ones.

the main problem is that there's been a lot of pressure from users in 
the other direction - bigger distributions, fewer jars. we've had quite 
a fair number of requests for comprehensive distributions containing 
everything in the jakarta commons but (until recently) very few people 
have come and made compelling arguments for the need for more compact 
and focussed distributions.

we could probably satisfy both those who want comprehensive libraries 
and those who need more compact ones by providing a monolithic jar and 
a set of modular jars within the binary distribution. wouldn't this 
satisfy both needs?

- robert

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message