commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen Colebourne" <>
Subject Re: [digester] local ArrayStack implementation notbackwardscompatible?
Date Wed, 05 May 2004 20:11:07 GMT
From: "Simon Kitching" <>
> So the only question is: should it be BeanUtils that copies the class
> and does a release (with Digester depending on the new BeanUtils
> release), or should the copied class be added to Digester, with Digester
> depending on the existing BeanUtils release?
> The latter is probably easier as we are about to do a Digester release
> anyway, but a new BeanUtils release would provide this "decoupling"
> feature to all BeanUtils users, not just Digester.

I would favour beanutils as I would like to minimise the places the code
gets copied to in this manner.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message