Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22003 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2004 20:07:01 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2004 20:07:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 55477 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2004 20:06:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 55410 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2004 20:06:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 55395 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2004 20:06:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp2.synygy.com) (207.106.136.38) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2004 20:06:46 -0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.synygy.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190FF194385 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:26:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp2.synygy.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.synygy.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11690-02 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:26:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from wine.synygy.net (wine.synygy.net [10.12.0.218]) by smtp2.synygy.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83186194017 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:26:45 -0500 (EST) Received: by wine.synygy.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 15:05:59 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Inger, Matthew" To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' Subject: RE: [all] [VFS] Where are the committers? Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 15:05:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at synygy.com X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N So, what's the licensing issues involved with moving a Sandbox component over the SF? -----Original Message----- From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 3:00 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [all] [VFS] Where are the committers? hi michael (please take this in the positive way in which it's intended.) i'm very sad to say that the jakarta commons rules don't really allow new committers to be nominated for sandbox components: existing apache committers will be granted karma upon request but new committers should only be elected for work on existing components. the jakarta commons team runs the sandbox on behalf of the jakarta pmc and the rules are theirs (not ours). so one option would be to repeat this request (or ask for an existing ASF committer to volunteer) on jakarta general. the sandbox is a public place where existing apache committers can experiment. some experiment gather momentum and gain promotion either to the commons proper or elsewhere. in other cases the committers loose interest and the component languishes. if vfs has good code but has lost it's community of developers then there are various options. hopefully an existing committer might volunteer to restart VFS development. with a healthy community, development and promotion could be reasonably quick. but if this doesn't happen then the VFS community might consider starting to work on an enhanced version over at sourceforge. you would still be very welcome to continue to use this list for communication but you would have the freedom to develop and nominate committers without the rules we need here at apache. if you choose the AL2.0 license then there's every possibility that the project could be reunified one day. - robert On 1 Apr 2004, at 09:21, Michael Davey wrote: > Hello, > > It looks as though the committers for VFS are currently busy working on > other projects. I would like to propose that a vote is held to admit > Mario Ivankovits as a Commons-Sandbox committer. > > Mario has been active on the developer list for over a year and has > submitted patches for FTP and VFS. More recently, Mario has spent > some time setting up a test server for VFS. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org/ > msg38267.html > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27776 > http://www.mail-archive.com/commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org/ > msg38413.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org/ > msg38412.html > > There has been increasing interest in the VFS project over the last few > months, and it needs someone to be focusing on it. Mario has expressed > an > interest in moving VFS forward and, I believe, is ready. > > However, I am not a committer myself, so is there anyone who would be > willing to sponsor this proposal and send out the appropriate "VOTE" > email? > > -- > Michael > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org