commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jörg Schaible <>
Subject RE: [configuration] Flattening trees
Date Wed, 31 Mar 2004 06:17:46 GMT
Oliver Heger wrote on Tuesday, March 30, 2004 9:25 PM:
>> Definately, but post 1.0. I think you will be able to remove a lot of
>> code with a real generic solution. For 1.0 we will have to modify the
>> Configuration interface at least in a way, we can solve the problem
>> with HierarchicalConfiguration and Oliver had a solution for this
>> (making Configuration hierarchical arware).
>> Regards,
>> Jörg
> Unfortunately I won't have time prior to Thursday evening.
> Can you tell
> me which unit tests are failing? If it's only the test for
> ConfigurationXMLDocument, I would suggest to drop this class
> in the 1.0
> release and add it later again (I think it is unlikely that
> this class
> is already used; it was lost after the move from sandbox and nobody
> noticed). Other tests should not fail because they still worked after
> the SubConfiguration refactoring.

Yes. It is the same old story.
> If we start thinking about more support for hierarchical
> configurations (an approach I really welcome), I now don't want to
> come up 
> with a quick
> solution for the actual problem. It would be much better to
> do it right
> in the next release.

Fine with me. I would be glad to get 1.0 out of the door and do the hierarchy refactoring/integration
for 1.1


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message