Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66646 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2004 22:21:46 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2004 22:21:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 50017 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2004 22:21:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 49974 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2004 22:21:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 49953 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2004 22:21:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk) (195.188.213.5) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2004 22:21:28 -0000 Received: from [10.0.0.2] ([82.38.65.173]) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sat, 7 Feb 2004 22:21:33 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612) In-Reply-To: <4025595A.6030902@latte.harvard.edu> References: <40255043.9090103@latte.harvard.edu> <0A80190A-59B2-11D8-A1A4-003065DC754C@blueyonder.co.uk> <4025595A.6030902@latte.harvard.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: robert burrell donkin Subject: Re: [general] Maven 'LATEST-RELEASE' tag suggestion Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 22:21:32 +0000 To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2004 22:21:33.0609 (UTC) FILETIME=[BE28C190:01C3EDC8] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 7 Feb 2004, at 21:32, Mark R. Diggory wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote: > >> On 7 Feb 2004, at 20:53, Mark R. Diggory wrote: >> >>> It also gives developers some room to work. If there is a global >>> nightly/weekly process for generating the commons site and its >>> sub-projects then in reality they probibly don't want the site >>> xref/xdocs generated off of thier bleeding edge all the time. >> hmmm... >> i'd probably want the best of both worlds - the latest and greatest >> version but also versions of the site for each release. i suppose >> that it'd be possible to do something with directories so >> commons/kool/current would contain the latest version but >> commons/kool/7.12.89/ would contain the documentation which was >> current when 7.12.89 was released. >> just a suggestion (rather than a criticism)... >> - robert > > No, thats a really good point about versioned javadoc. Javadoc for > version 1.0, 2.0, ..., Current of a subproject. > > This would require maintaining the content of previous release site > generations, pushing into a special directory reserved for its > archiving. craig advocated something similar in the original commons release documents (but only kept the last release). it shouldn't be too great a burden to copy the current website into a specially numbered directory when a release is cut. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org