Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13618 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2004 22:50:43 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2004 22:50:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 44759 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2004 22:50:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 44637 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2004 22:50:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 44538 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2004 22:50:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO exchange.sun.com) (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2004 22:50:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 18276 invoked by uid 50); 2 Feb 2004 22:50:25 -0000 Date: 2 Feb 2004 22:50:25 -0000 Message-ID: <20040202225025.18275.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26584] - Support required hidden fields. X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26584 Support required hidden fields. ------- Additional Comments From Joe@Germuska.com 2004-02-02 22:50 ------- I would go on the assumption that any validation which can be used for a text field should be permissible with a hidden field; people always come up with something you didn't think of. The reason those field type checks are there is not so much because certain fields shouldn't be validated, as much as there are different methods for dereferencing the value of different form field types. It might be worth just going through and adding it everywhere that 'field.type == 'text' ' is permitted. I'm not thinking of any substantial risks to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org