Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70754 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2004 17:26:52 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2004 17:26:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 88182 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2004 17:26:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 87973 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2004 17:26:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 87957 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2004 17:26:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web41311.mail.yahoo.com) (66.218.93.60) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2004 17:26:40 -0000 Message-ID: <20040201172643.93567.qmail@web41311.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.101.47.10] by web41311.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 09:26:43 PST Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 09:26:43 -0800 (PST) From: Al Chou Subject: Re: [math] Details on Cutting the release To: Jakarta Commons Developers List In-Reply-To: <401D3125.7050804@latte.harvard.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --- "Mark R. Diggory" wrote: > Al Chou wrote: > > > --- "Mark R. Diggory" wrote: > > [deletia] > > > > > >>*jar release* (jar) > >> > >> > >>>Archive: commons-math-0.1-dev.jar > > > > [deletia] > > > > > >>So the jar has no tests and no experimental code within it. > >> > >> > >>Any Comments? > >> > >>-Mark > > > > > > > > Sorry to chime in so late, but my preference would be to include the tests > no > > matter which release package it is. They serve as examples of using the > code, > > even if one decided to suspect them as a validation of the correctness of > the > > code (which is up to the individual user). I know that may seem to > hybridize > > all release packages, but if it were standard to include test source with > all > > our release packages, it maybe wouldn't seem like they were hybrids as much > as > > it would be just an additional form of documentation. > > > > > > Al > > Yes Al, we should plan to include the src/test java files into the > source and binary tar/zip distributions. But (IMHO) the > commons-math-1.0.jar itself is strictly just the api. I think this is > the standard way that commons projects are packaged. > > -Mark I guess the jar file distribution is for when you need to grab a library you already know you depend on, without getting anything else -- say, when you're installing an already-written app that depends on a jar, and that jar didn't come with the app. That makes sense to me, I've certainly needed that sort of packaging enough times myself! Al __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org