commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <>
Subject Re: [all] maven sites
Date Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:01:33 GMT

To be mavenised:


I'll work on Discovery tonight.  Do we have a template and
xdocs/*.* yet for new projects?

I'm very +1 for staying on the stable release of Maven and not HEAD, use
another machine or just change your MAVEN_HOME to get the other one [I
bounce back and forth between rc1 and 0.7 at work without major issues].

I also like the idea of not having the Sandbox'd projects in the nav-bar
that Stephen suggested a few days ago.


On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, robert burrell donkin wrote:

> On 16 Feb 2004, at 03:56, Tim O'Brien wrote:
> > Hey, someone is publishing Commons Maven sites with an unreleased
> > version of Maven.  Probably either from Maven's CVS HEAD, or a beta
> > version.
> >
> > BeanUtils, Betwixt, and Digester all have the newish Maven L+F.  A
> > decision was reached a while back to standardize on the released
> > version of Maven.
> >
> > Could whoever did that please get the released version of Maven and
> > republish those sites?
> i'm using a version nearer cvs head. i'm not very keen on downgrading
> since it always seems to take a couple of hours for me to get a version
> of maven that i'm happy with.
> we're nearing a situation where we'll be able to build the entire
> commons site from a single command. there are only a handful of site
> remaining to be converted. anyone feel like volunteering to take care
> of them?.
> i'd be happy to avoid deploying the website (with my development
> version of maven) so long as we start deploying every component website
> rather than each atomically. how close are we to having a usable
> reactor documentation build?
> - robert
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message