commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitri Plotnikov <dmi...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Bug 26853] New: - Improving MapDynamicPropertyHandler
Date Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:50:10 GMT
Yann,

Sure, I'll commit the change. But just out of curiousity, what is that
situtation where map.size() != map.keySet().size()?  It almost feels
like it would break a bunch of other things.

Thanks for the report.

- Dmitri


--- bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26853>.
> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
> 
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26853
> 
> Improving MapDynamicPropertyHandler
> 
>            Summary: Improving MapDynamicPropertyHandler
>            Product: Commons
>            Version: Nightly Builds
>           Platform: All
>         OS/Version: All
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: Enhancement
>           Priority: Other
>          Component: JXPath
>         AssignedTo: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
>         ReportedBy: ydu@zurich.ibm.com
> 
> 
> in: org.apache.commons.jxpath.MapDynamicPropertyHandler
> 
> If the following code:
>     public String[] getPropertyNames(Object object) {
>         Map map = (Map) object;
>         String names[] = new String[map.size()];
>         Iterator it = map.keySet().iterator();
>         for (int i = 0; i < names.length; i++) {
>             names[i] = String.valueOf(it.next());
>         }
>         return names;
>     }
> 
> could be replaced by:
> 	public String[] getPropertyNames(Object object) {
> 		Set keys = ((Map) object).keySet();
> 		String names[] = new String[keys.size()];
> 		Iterator it = keys.iterator();
> 		for (int i = 0; i < names.length; i++) {
> 			names[i] = String.valueOf(it.next());
> 		}
> 		return names;
> 	}
> 
> 
> This would permit to support very special cases where
> Map.keySet().size() !=
> Map.size() [which, I know, does not conform to the Map API]. 
> Anyway, in general, it is better to compute the size on the Set we
> are actually
> using and not on another one related to it...
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yann Duponchel.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message