commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen Colebourne" <>
Subject Re: [lang] is Apache License 2.0 compliant.
Date Thu, 19 Feb 2004 01:45:34 GMT
The LICENSE.txt file differs between [lang] and [collections]. Seems to be a
line ending thing. We should try to make them the same one way or other.

Also (less significant) [lang] and [collections] now differ in the license
slightly. [lang] uses 1 space in the java comment as an indent.
[collections] uses 2 spaces. I prefer the 1 space, so I suggest we try and
use that generally. In XML licenses there is also a difference in

(I didn't do the build files in [collections], but I suppose they are
covered too :-0 )


----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Gregory" <>
> Hello all,
> [lang] is Apache License 2.0 compliant by the page
> If I've missing some, please let me know.
> What I've missed on purpose:
> - The manifest (.MF) file. Can MF files have comments? I do not see them
> spec'd here:
> Thanks,
> Gary

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message