commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen Colebourne" <scolebou...@btopenworld.com>
Subject Re: [all] maven sites
Date Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:30:51 GMT
Once again, this misses the point for me. The newer maven style is much
worse not better. We need a L+F that is controlled by commons, not by
whatever maven decides to do today. I'll try and play tonight.

Stephen


----- Original Message -----
From: <dion@multitask.com.au>
> And the 'new look and feel' can be done by using RC1 and the included
> xdocs/project.css (from memory).
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
>
>
>
> "Martin Cooper" <martinc@apache.org> wrote on 16/02/2004 03:17:00 PM:
>
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:tobrien@discursive.com]
> > > Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 7:57 PM
> > > To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> > > Subject: [all] maven sites
> > >
> > >
> > > Hey, someone is publishing Commons Maven sites with an unreleased
> > > version of Maven.  Probably either from Maven's CVS HEAD, or a
> > > beta version.
> > >
> > > BeanUtils, Betwixt, and Digester all have the newish Maven L+F.  A
> > > decision was reached a while back to standardize on the released
> version
> > > of Maven.
> > >
> > > Could whoever did that please get the released version of Maven and
> > > republish those sites?
> >
> > There is no released version of Maven yet, according to the Maven web
> site.
> > There's just RC1.
> >
> > --
> > Martin Cooper



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message