Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4890 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2004 21:15:07 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jan 2004 21:15:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 15532 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2004 21:14:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 15377 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2004 21:14:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 15348 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2004 21:14:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.lokitech.com) (209.92.53.4) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jan 2004 21:14:48 -0000 Received: from 209.92.53.102 ([209.92.53.102]) by mail.lokitech.com (JAMES SMTP Server 2.1.3) with SMTP ID 109 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:20:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <401AAFA1.10107@lokitech.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:25:21 -0500 From: Serge Knystautas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [JIRA][Bugzilla][HttpClient] should I stay or should I go? References: <400B945500071FB0@mssbzhb-int.msg.bluewin.ch> In-Reply-To: <400B945500071FB0@mssbzhb-int.msg.bluewin.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Oleg, Sorry, I thought many of these points were addressed in the general discussion about commons and JIRA. I will respond specifically to each of your questions below... olegk@bluewin.ch wrote: > * Do you actually encourage migration from Bugzilla to JIRA? Will it > make the task of to administering and supporting projects' > infrastructure (issue tracking in the first place) easier for you? No, we will not encourage. > * Can existing bug reports (including closed ones) be migrated to JIRA > in their entirety, if at all? What kind of data would not be migrated > automatically? Would existing user accounts be preserved? Yes, existing bug reports can be transfered in their entirety. There is a data migration process. All accounts would also be preserved, although after the conversion, if you change your password in one place (JIRA or bugzilla), it won't change in the other. > * We (HttpClient committers & contributors) have been in fact quite > satisfied with Bugzilla so far. It has served us well. The only thing we > have found constraining is the release management (versions, milestones, > etc). Agreed, release management is really the kicker for why I wanted it for the James project and why I've been (slowly) getting JIRA running. > As an alternative to migration to JIRA would it be possible to > promote HttpClient from a component of Jakarta-commons project to a full > fledged top level project with its own set of versions and milestones? > HttpClient has already got its own mailing list. HttpClient related > content constitutes 20-30% Bugzilla entries for the Jakarta-commons > project. I believe this might be the best option, as least as far as we > are concerned. I am just not sure it is technically feasible. I don't know who or if anybody maintains the bugzilla info. I would send just this request to the infrastructure mailing list and hopefully someone can help. -- Serge Knystautas President Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. sergek@lokitech.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org