commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel F. Savarese" <...@savarese.org>
Subject Re: [net] 1.2 release (Re: [net] checked in parser factory implementation)
Date Wed, 07 Jan 2004 17:14:43 GMT

In message <200401061947.15138.scohen@javactivity.org>, steve cohen writes:
>I keep coming back to the ant use case and how we'd handle it there.  I 
>suppose we could add yet another parameter to the ant <ftp> task to handle 
>this odd case, but I'd rather not.  I'm still not happy with this but I don't 
>have a better suggestion yet.

Okay, so am I correct that in ant you can explictly define the parser key?
If that's the case then one can implement a factory that recognizes a
special parser key (or add it to the default factory), like VMSV that
will create a VMS entry parser which handles versioning.  That is, assuming
the ant task calls listFiles(String, String), which is what I understood
to be the reason you gave to keep the method public when Jeffrey suggested
it not be public.

daniel



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message