commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Horsman <>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Re: [jexl] - checking for unresolved variables
Date Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:02:06 GMT
Hi Paul,

On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 22:39, Paul Libbrecht wrote:

> But this getVars could return a map that still uses your getVars, or ? 
> It's more work, I know, but it's the power of interfaces in principle.
> I think getVars() can be quite of use in some context.

Yep, I suppose so. But I like the idea of a very small API and only
adding methods as required. IMHO anyway.

Another advantage of not implementing the MAP interface directly is that
you then have the flexibility of choosing another storage method without
breaking the JexlContext implementation.

I appreciate your feedback - much better than being ignored :) 


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message