Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41603 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2003 18:13:45 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Nov 2003 18:13:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 96258 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2003 18:13:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 96040 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2003 18:13:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 96026 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2003 18:13:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtpout.mac.com) (17.250.248.46) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Nov 2003 18:13:34 -0000 Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (8.12.6/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id hALIDcJs028992 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:13:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.172] (ns1.capeclear.com [193.120.208.97]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin07/MantshX 3.0) with ESMTP id hALIDaPd024275 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:13:37 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606) In-Reply-To: <57F6C9D473290148AB2E56E10010646E0A6F6A4E@uskihsvpex05.kih.kmart.com> References: <57F6C9D473290148AB2E56E10010646E0A6F6A4E@uskihsvpex05.kih.kmart.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <6CF62C45-1C4E-11D8-BB50-00039379521C@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Keyes Subject: Re: [lang][codec] Sanity checking a client project build Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 18:13:36 +0000 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > I'd love to have unit tests that I can run whenever I patch my system. > As a > matter of fact, I predict that an OS vendor who could provide that > would > make a killing with corporations who are tired of patching their > patched > patches to ensure the fixpack patches don't overlay their patched > fixpacks. > > If you've ever worked with a multi OS/multi hardware platform shop, > you'd > know it would be great to have SOME sort of test to give you a warm > fuzzy > feeling. I can see how this would matter if your were rolling a patch out to a bunch of machines but for one machine it is not worthwhile. My example sucked - apologies. I just think that it is a lot of extra work for little potential gain in this case. When a jakarta-commons project is ready for release an email is sent to this list, stating where the release candidate is and asking projects who depend on it to test this latest release out. This is when those projects need to run all of their tests with this new release. If any of their tests break well then a second release candidate is required at the very least. I really don't see the need to run all of the tests for each of the dependencies. -John K --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org