commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From d...@multitask.com.au
Subject RE: [general] screwed up Commons site
Date Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:21:34 GMT
Is this a definite rule?

Is there somewhere it's mandated?

I'm asking as I don't remember it being required.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/



"Noel J. Bergman" <noel@devtech.com> wrote on 18/11/2003 02:29:18 PM:

> > I assume you are talking about the docs at
> > /www/jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/.  The HttpClient site is
> > not maintained in CVS.  It is generated via Maven and published with
> > maven site:deploy.
> 
> As far as I know, all sites are supposed to be in CVS, and checked out 
into
> the file system.  Amongst the reasons for this are to ensure that
> infrastructure can recover them rapidly in the event of a problem.  This
> includes sites generated by Forrest or Maven.
> 
>    --- Noel
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message