commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Strachan <james_strac...@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: [logging] Resolving Logj4 issue
Date Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:13:22 GMT
On 12 Nov 2003, at 17:00, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> The Log4J issue on geronimo-dev@ brought out the suggestion that Log4J
> (right place) or Commons Logging (expedient place) add TRACE level 
> support
> to the core code, thus relieving each app from having to do it.
>
> I also suggest that geronimo-dev give serious consideration to adopting
> Log4J v1.3, on the grounds that it will be the Release version long 
> before
> Geronimo is ready for Release, and Log4J has changes that effect this 
> code
> area.
>
> If either of those things happen, I believe that the Log4J issue goes 
> away.

 From a Geronimo perspective, since commons-logging already has a trace 
level, we could just trash any log4j code from Geronimo for now. Then 
when a log4j and commons-logging release comes out which supports trace 
level then we get the trace level code back again.

Ceki will log4j 1.3 support trace level?

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message