commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Arun Thomas" <arun.tho...@paybytouch.com>
Subject RE: Log interface should be loaded by loadClass method
Date Mon, 03 Nov 2003 17:21:00 GMT
Hmmm....

The difficulty here seems to be in that the proper use if not easy to understand, and that
the thought in "well thought out" doesn't seem to be documented (at least I didn't see it
after a quick glance).  If someone can point the way to the mail threads that covered the
"thinking" process, I'd willingly take a stab at trying to capture those thoughts onto paper
(or virtual paper as the case may be), and submit it back to the list.  The distillation of
a newcomer to the discussion (any of the other new comers could also do this) would probably
help to identify which parts of the thought process would be difficult for others to understand.
 

I'm sure the JCL works well in many situations, and certainly for the situations it was specifically
designed to handle (servelet containers, etc).  It may work well for all situations, but it
appears that the "how" of that is not really clear to new users.  

Let's try and clarify the how, and then see what the feeling is on classloading, etc.  

-AMT

-----Original Message-----
From: bugzilla@apache.org [mailto:bugzilla@apache.org] 
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:36 AM
To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24353] - Log interface should be loaded by loadClass method


DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24353>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24353

Log interface should be loaded by loadClass method

remm@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX



------- Additional Comments From remm@apache.org  2003-11-03 13:35 ------- I disagree with
this. If used properly, you'll see that commons-logging classloading handling is well thought
out, and works perfectly well. Pesonally, I am against the change you propose.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message