commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Becke <>
Subject Re: [general] screwed up Commons site
Date Tue, 18 Nov 2003 04:24:50 GMT
It seems there are a large number of commons sites that do not exist in 
CVS.  Is there a standard for this?  Should the HttpClient entries in 
CVS be removed?


On Nov 17, 2003, at 10:29 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:

>> I assume you are talking about the docs at
>> /www/  The HttpClient site is
>> not maintained in CVS.  It is generated via Maven and published with
>> maven site:deploy.
> As far as I know, all sites are supposed to be in CVS, and checked out 
> into
> the file system.  Amongst the reasons for this are to ensure that
> infrastructure can recover them rapidly in the event of a problem.  
> This
> includes sites generated by Forrest or Maven.
> 	--- Noel
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message