Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30544 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2003 17:16:43 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 2003 17:16:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 93524 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2003 17:16:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 93459 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2003 17:16:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 93445 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2003 17:16:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO astra.telenet-ops.be) (195.130.132.58) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 2003 17:16:32 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 5811537EDB for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 18:16:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from pandora.be (D5E05E23.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.94.35]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2484837EE7 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 18:16:35 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <3F9C016A.9050903@pandora.be> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 18:16:26 +0100 From: Dirk Verbeeck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [DBCP] Bug with Poolable PreparedStatements and DriverAdapterCPDS References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Noel J. Bergman wrote: >>Looks like there is a bug in prepared statement pooling of > > DriverAdapterCPDS. > >>You can report this issue in bugzilla against v1.1. > > Does this mean we'll be having a 1.1.1 soon? I saw another bug reported > this AM regarding maxActive=0. That one was closed as invalid by the reporter himself. But there is another bug reported in InstanceKeyDataSourceFactory. A 1.1.1 release with bugfixes is possible of course. Dirk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org