commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brent Worden" <br...@worden.org>
Subject RE: [math] Complex implementation
Date Wed, 22 Oct 2003 03:54:13 GMT
Here's the previous complex thread is was referring to
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listId=15&msgNo=28132

Brent Worden
http://www.brent.worden.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brent Worden [mailto:brent@worden.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 10:53 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [math] Complex implementation
>
>
> > I know we've talked about this before, It's not fresh in my mind why we
> > decided against it.
> >
> > -Mark
> >
>
> Looking back at the mail archives, it appears we decided against a complex
> class mainly for two reasons:
> 1) Not too many RW applications warrant a complex class and can be
> accommodated with two double values.
> 2) There are plenty of other OS, complex implementations available so it
> wasn't crucial to having one in commons-math.
>
> Brent Worden
> http://www.brent.worden.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message