commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark R. Diggory" <>
Subject Re: [math] Complex implementation
Date Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:40:32 GMT

I know we've talked about this before, It's not fresh in my mind why we 
decided against it.

Some thoughts:

I'm worried that we'ed be re-inventing a lowgrade OO version of Complex. 
I think anything would be somewhat temporary until something like this 
actually occurs:

Not to suggest I'm not for creating a Complex class, I just know we have 
issues. Whate ever happened to the efforts at JCP to solve the complex 
matrice conundrum?


p.s. We really need to get out of the sandbox, can we startup a thread 
to review where we're at? I know developers/contributors like 
Pietschmann have done alot of effort in the last few weeks. I need to 
get into the Bug trak and apply some patches.

J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Just to bring this subject up again.
> Can you provide a short proposal what you need? A Complex class
> with the usual operations and functions (norm(), arg(), exp(),
> log(), sin() etc...), similar to j.m.Integer?
> J.Pietschmann
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

Mark Diggory
Software Developer
Harvard MIT Data Center

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message