commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen Colebourne" <>
Subject Re: [collections] jar file names
Date Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:18:44 GMT
From: "Rob Oxspring" <>
> Is there any reason why both full words couldn't be used? I'm imagining a
> component called collections-primitive that involves no repackaging.  I
> guess it might clash with a future primitives subpackage of collections
> but that's surely not on the cards is it?
> > Are you happy for the package to be pcollections?
> Can't remember if its in any charter or not but my thinking is that the
> package should always match the compontent name.  When the jar name also
> follows suit and maintanence is so much easier for the end user.

Possible, but I think probably more confusing in the long term. It seems
worth taking a package rename now for the greater clarity.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message