Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 47577 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2003 21:20:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO adicia.telenet-ops.be) (195.130.132.56) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2003 21:20:39 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AE9C38007 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:20:45 +0200 (MEST) Received: from pandora.be (D5E05816.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.88.22]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5282C3800F for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:20:45 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <3F78A22B.5070802@pandora.be> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:20:43 +0200 From: Dirk Verbeeck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE][Pool] Release Plan for Commons-Pool 2.0 References: <9C5166762F311146951505C6790A9CF8013DF396@US-VS1.corp.mpi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I made the use of (multiple) Release Condidates more explicit in the release plan. Testing commons-pool standalone will be very usefull. Be sure to try the performance test at: commons-pool/src/test/org/apache/commons/pool/performance/PerformanceTest.java Cheers Dirk Shapira, Yoav wrote: >Howdy, >I'll be glad to help test commons-pool standalone, as I see others are >already testing it within Tomcat and within James. > >+1 on the plan. > >Yoav Shapira >Millennium ChemInformatics > >