commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From robert burrell donkin <>
Subject Re: [beanutils] some ideas
Date Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:25:34 GMT
On Sunday, September 28, 2003, at 08:43 AM, Sgarlata Matt wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henri Yandell" <>
> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <>
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 10:39 PM
> Subject: [beanutils] some ideas


>> Solutions could be either:
>> 1) Improve the system for the mapping converters so it is many-to-many.
>> 2) Create a hierarchy structure. A ConvertUtilsBeansConverter could be
>> plugged in to handle a class, and would contain its own batch of
>> Converters.
>> Any ideas?
> I think the Converter interface is fine, but could perhaps use some better
> documentation and examples (in the JavaDoc... the converters in the
> distribution seem more general-purpose than will be the converters a user
> needs to create).  I do like the idea of adding a new
> ConvertUtils.register(Converter, Class from, Class to) method.

this (and related issues) have come up before. i've thought about this 
quite a lot and i'm in favour of making the conversion pluggable strategy.
  this would allow both different and more sophisticated conversion 
algorithms to be created without breaking backwards compatibility. i don't 
realistically have the time to go about the creation of new 
implementations right now but i can certainly point people in the right 
direction if they want to go down this route.

BTW stephen has talked before about creating a separate component that 
would provide sophisticated solutions to the issue posed by conversion. it 
might be a good idea to involve him in any design discussions. i now also 
that ted (of struts fame) is interested in the conversion problem so there 
may be enough momentum to at least think about creating a dedicated 

- robert

View raw message