commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Harish Krishnaswamy <hkrishnasw...@comcast.net>
Subject Re: [HiveMind] naming update
Date Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:58:08 GMT
To me implementation implies core implementation that's probably where 
the disconnect is. What does it instantly mean to others?

-Harish

Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:

>>The point I am trying to make is you could already have a service 
>>implementation provided by some third party in a module and all you 
>>could be doing is adding an interceptor to it. In that case 
>>implementation doesn't sound appropriate, its more a contribution, I 
>>think. What you say?!
>>
>>-Harish
>>    
>>
>
>You are providing a part of the implementation, in the form of an interceptor.
>
>--
>Howard M. Lewis Ship
>Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
>http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
>http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
>http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>  
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message