commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Harish Krishnaswamy <hkrishnasw...@comcast.net>
Subject Re: [HiveMind] naming update
Date Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:32:23 GMT
The point I am trying to make is you could already have a service 
implementation provided by some third party in a module and all you 
could be doing is adding an interceptor to it. In that case 
implementation doesn't sound appropriate, its more a contribution, I 
think. What you say?!

-Harish

Bill Lear wrote:

>On Thursday, September 18, 2003 at 12:17:26 (-0400) Harish Krishnaswamy writes:
>  
>
>>Because implementation is not intuitive in the following, I think,
>>
>><implementation..>
>>   <interceptor.../>
>></implementation>
>>    
>>
>
>Hmm, is it really?:
>
><implementation service-id="Adder" interface="hivemind.examples.Adder">
>    <create-instance class="hivemind.examples.impl.AdderImpl"/>
>    <interceptor service-id="hivemind.LoggingInterceptor"/>
></implementation>
>
>The implementation adds an interceptor to the service.  I think it's
>good.
>
>
>Bill
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>  
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message