commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Harish Krishnaswamy <hkrishnasw...@comcast.net>
Subject Re: [HiveMind] naming update
Date Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:17:26 GMT
Because implementation is not intuitive in the following, I think,

<implementation..>
    <interceptor.../>
</implementation>

And I don't think there is any implementation for a configuration, right?

-Harish

Bill Lear wrote:

>On Thursday, September 18, 2003 at 12:07:14 (-0400) Harish Krishnaswamy writes:
>  
>
>>How about this...
>>
>><service id="...">
>><contribution service-id="...">
>><configuration id="...">
>><contribution configuration-id="...">
>>
>>How do you like this?
>>    
>>
>
>I still prefer consistent id naming conventions:
>
><service service-id="...">
><contribution service-id="...">
><configuration configuration-id="...">
><contribution configuration-id="...">
>
>but not sure I like "contribution" instead of "implementation".  So,
>why not:
>
><service service-id="...">
><implementation service-id="...">
><configuration configuration-id="...">
><implementation configuration-id="...">
>
>errr....
>
>
>Bill
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>  
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message