commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ja...@carmanconsulting.com
Subject Re: [HiveMind] naming update
Date Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:15:30 GMT
I don't know if I'd put the "for" in there, but I like the "implementation"
idea....

<implementation service-id="yaddayaddayadda">

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Howard M. Lewis Ship" <hlship@comcast.net>
To: "'Jakarta Commons Developers List'" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:00 AM
Subject: RE: [HiveMind] naming update


> Current consensus:
>
> <service id=> --> <service-point id=>
> <extend-service service-id=> --> <service for-service-id=>
> <extension-point id=> --> <configuration-point id=>
> <extension point-id=> --> <configuration for-point-id=>
>
> ... but consider:
>
> <extend-service service-id=> --> <implementation for-service-id=>
>
> --
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
> http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Howard M. Lewis Ship [mailto:hlship@comcast.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 7:39 AM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: [HiveMind] naming update
> >
> >
> > Harish's suggestion:
> >
> > <service id=> --> <service-point id=>
> > <extend-service service-id=> --> <service service-id=>
> > <extension-point id=> --> <configuration-point id=>
> > <extension point-id=> --> <configuration point-id=>
> >
> > Everyone seems pretty keen on this.
> >
> > I have minor reservations about <service> not quite capturing
> > what the element does.  I agree that <extend-service> has
> > some unwanted connotations.  <provide-service> perhaps? At
> > one time it was <contribute-service>.
> >
> > Last point was the excessive simularity of
> > <configuration-point id="..."> and <configuration point-id="...">.
> >
> > Perhaps that should be <configuration for-point-id="..."> to
> > help distinguish the two visually? An earlier version was
> > <contribute-configuration> but damn thats long.
> >
> > Alternately, here's my suggestion:
> >
> > <service> --> <define-service-point>
> > <extend-service> --> <service>
> > <extension-point> --> <define-configuration-point>
> > <extension> --> <configuration>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Howard M. Lewis Ship
> > Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
> >
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
> http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>


Mime
View raw message