commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <bay...@generationjava.com>
Subject RE: [lang] Lang 2.0 release?
Date Thu, 21 Aug 2003 04:43:35 GMT

I'm using Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
1.4.0_01-b03) on Linux for the builds.

I can go ahead and upgrade that to 1.4.2 tomorrow and see if that
improves.

Hen

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Gary Gregory wrote:

> I've seen this Javadoc/Brower rendering problem before and I seem to recall
> that I saw something different b/w Mozilla 1.4 and IE 6.0.
>
> Gary
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil@steitz.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 21:21
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [lang] Lang 2.0 release?
> >
> > Henri Yandell wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>This is all good news. I have two Q's:
> > >>
> > >>(1) What about an RC-4 that is publicized to the commons-user list such
> > that
> > >>real users can raise issues such that we can:
> > >>
> > >>	(a) document them in a migration doc or
> > >>	(b) fix them.
> > >
> > >
> > > Dunno. Do we want users to be using RCs? I think I'd prefer to have them
> > > use the x.0 and release an x.0.1 for any issues etc.
> > >
> > >
> > >>(2) It's seems trivial to add the missing @since tags JDiff complains
> > about.
> > >>Or that just too anal?
> > >
> > >
> > > S'not too hard to remove the tag and redo the build. Feel free to commit
> > > them :)
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> > >
> > >>Gary
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>-----Original Message-----
> > >>>From: Henri Yandell [mailto:bayard@generationjava.com]
> > >>>Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 20:01
> > >>>To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > >>>Subject: [lang] Lang 2.0 release?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>Seems that since RC3, we've just:
> > >>>
> > >>>removed an unused private attribute
> > >>>updated javadoc in a few places
> > >>>removed a method
> > >>>moved 2 classes up a package from util
> > >>>removed a class from util
> > >>>
> > >>>While I could build an RC4, I'm going to be hopeful and build a release
> > >>>build. CVS tags can always be deleted/moved in case of major issues
> > >>>again.
> > >>>
> > >>>If no one can find a problem by tomorrow morning, I'll call a vote on
> > >>>Commons-dev, Ccing the PMC. Assuming things go well, we ought to get
3
> > >>>non-Lang +1's by the weekend.
> > >>>
> > >>>I'll aim to do the release stuff over the weekend [mirrors will be new
> > to
> > >>>me] and have the release on the site by the end of the weekend, which
> > >>>always seems to be good timing.
> > >>>
> > >>>Any thoughts?
> > >>>
> >
> > There is something funny in the javadoc in the .gz.  Somehow the @author
> > tags were transformed incorrectly.  Here is the HTML source for the
> > author element from the .gz/docs for CharSetUtils (same happens for
> > every class that has more than one author):
> >
> > <dt><b>Author:</b><dd><a href="bayard@generationjava.com">Henri
> > Yandell</a></dd>
> > , Stephen Colebourne</dd>
> > , Phil Steitz</dd>
> >
> > On Mozilla, at least, this causes extra line breaks.
> >
> > When I use the 1.4.2 doclet to generate, I get well-formed HTML:
> >
> > <dt><b>Author:</b></dt>
> >    <dd><a href="bayard@generationjava.com">Henri Yandell</a>,
Stephen
> > Colebourne, Phil Steitz</dd>
> >
> > What JDK did you use to generate the javadoc?  Is this a known
> > bug/feature?
> >
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>


Mime
View raw message