commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From d...@multitask.com.au
Subject Re: [docs] Crappy build system
Date Tue, 12 Aug 2003 05:44:03 GMT
Why do you need the jars in cvs to build the docs?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/


Henri Yandell <bayard@generationjava.com> wrote on 12/08/2003 01:06:09 PM:

> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Glenn Nielsen wrote:
> 
> > Henri Yandell wrote:
> > >
> > > Ouch. The 1.7M Xerces jar is hurting my uplink :)
> > >
> >
> > Yeah, and that is one of many reasons not to put jars into CVS.
> 
> So I should ask velocity for commit rights so I can remove it there? I
> have commit rights for jakarta-site2, so I can go ahead and remove 
things
> from there.
> 
> Having the jar in CVS once is bad. Having it in N times makes no
> difference, so if we're going to have them in CVS I'd rather the system
> was a) simpler and b) stable.
> 
> Although I've checked them in, I can rm them from the repo if need be.
> Another option would be to move the xdocs over to the jakarta-site2
> module.
> 
> Hen
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message