commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Noel J. Bergman" <>
Subject RE: DBCP status?
Date Wed, 02 Jul 2003 22:06:35 GMT
> > Some of the "AbandonedTrace" behavior is still necessary to implement
> > the JDBC specification.  Connections still need to track outstanding
> > statements and results sets, which are closed by Connection.close().

> Agreed, but the way it was implemented was completely wrong.  The behavior
> should not have been in a superclass and forced unrelated classes to
> subclass it.

I actually had a sentence about that, but I removed it.

> Let DBCP focus on it's core responsibilities and provide easy
> hooks to allow logging, policy decisions, etc.

What hooks do you see as necessary in the base class(es)?

	--- Noel

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message