commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From __matthewHawthorne <mhawtho...@alumni.pitt.edu>
Subject Re: [io] some minor enhancements and completed action items
Date Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:30:41 GMT
Maybe we can create the newly named classes, but leave the old ones and 
deprecate them?

This may be good for the short term, but we will have to think of a 
strategy for removing them, since it wouldn't make sense to have a 1.0 
release with deprecated classes.




Jeremias Maerki wrote:

>Yup, seen them. Will look at them on Thursday or Friday if nobody acts
>sooner. But the rename will likely provoke some Gump failures. Do we
>need to inform the dependant projects prior to the renaming or shall we
>just make it happen and let the others sort it out (IO is not released)?
>
>On 22.07.2003 18:07:34 __matthewHawthorne wrote:
>  
>
>>I submitted patches for some small changes, everything is in bugzilla:
>>
>>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21801
>>    
>>
>
>
>Jeremias Maerki
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>  
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message