Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 23566 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2003 00:21:17 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2003 00:21:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 26884 invoked by uid 97); 5 Jun 2003 00:23:39 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 26877 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2003 00:23:38 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2003 00:23:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 23294 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2003 00:21:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23277 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2003 00:21:14 -0000 Received: from web41304.mail.yahoo.com (66.218.93.53) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2003 00:21:14 -0000 Message-ID: <20030605002122.40741.qmail@web41304.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [65.213.54.92] by web41304.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 17:21:22 PDT Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 17:21:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Al Chou Subject: Re: [math] [OT]UnivariateImpl - when sumsq ~ xbar*xbar*((double) n) To: Jakarta Commons Developers List In-Reply-To: <3EDE6581.7040103@latte.harvard.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --- "Mark R. Diggory" wrote: > Al Chou wrote: > >>>OK, I hope the article we want is available online, given that it's pretty > >>>old. > >>> > >>> > >>Strangely, it's actually the recent stuff that is not available. JSTOR has > >>American Statistician from 1947-1997. If you want a chuckle, have a look > at > >>http://www.jstor.org/about/movingwall.html, which explains the rationale > for > >>this. > >> > > > >It's all about money, eh? Well, as long as we have access to what we need, > >that's fine. Incidentally, I'm much more accustomed to seeing online > editions > >directly from the publisher, which explains why I expected only issues more > >recent than some date to be available. > > > > > >Al > > > Yes, the deal is that JStor would undercut the publishers profits from > printing if they exposed an article too soon. JStor isn't a "publisher", > just a "digital library". Its the publishers choice to provide access > online to the article, if they decide not to release it online, its to > promote subscriptions to the printed copies. > > IMHO, in cases where we can't find references to content that is > publicly available, we should feel ok about referencing a > "semi-protected" source like a journal article as long as its abstract > is public and its content is accessible at educational institutions. > -M. I agree that references to printed journal articles should be sufficient if there aren't online references. There are certainly scientific authors whose publications reference works that are hard to obtain, and that seems to be acceptable to the publishers even if it's frustrating to the readers. I hope we do at least somewhat better than that. Al ===== Albert Davidson Chou Get answers to Mac questions at http://www.Mac-Mgrs.org/ . __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org