commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From robert burrell donkin <>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Re: [Docs] Component Lists
Date Fri, 13 Jun 2003 06:47:45 GMT
On Friday, June 13, 2003, at 01:05 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:

> On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:15:34 +0100
> (Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [Docs] Component Lists)
> robert burrell donkin <> wrote:


>> pool - i'm reluctant to apply this since i'm not a committer for pool.
>> i realize that this is the second time you've submitted this patch
>> (and thanks for your patience) but could you post this patch again
>> prefixed with [pool] so that the component's maintainers have a
>> better chance to spot it.
> Okay.
> By the way, the subject should be "[pool][patch] .." ?
> or "[patch][pool] .."?   ... Which is better?

i'd personally write [PATCH][pool] but it shouldn't matter. the main thing 
is that most pool developers will be filtering for those messages 
containing pool in the subject. anyone else have any opinions?

> Also, which is better, "[PATCH][DOCS] .." or "[SITE][PATCH].."
> for the patches to the jakarta-commons site (non-specific to
> each subprojects)?

i'm not sure. anyone else have any opinions?

- robert

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message