Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 74937 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 11:51:04 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 May 2003 11:51:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 25154 invoked by uid 97); 15 May 2003 11:53:07 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 25147 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 11:53:07 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 15 May 2003 11:53:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 74676 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2003 11:51:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 74609 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 11:51:00 -0000 Received: from umbongo.flamefew.net (64.253.103.114) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 May 2003 11:51:00 -0000 Received: by umbongo.flamefew.net (Postfix on Linux (i386), from userid 500) id D729818A6; Thu, 15 May 2003 07:50:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by umbongo.flamefew.net (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with ESMTP id D615218A2 for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 07:50:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 07:50:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Henri Yandell X-X-Sender: hen@umbongo.flamefew.net To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [math] mavenization? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, 15 May 2003, robert burrell donkin wrote: > On Thursday, May 15, 2003, at 07:37 AM, dion@multitask.com.au wrote: > > i think that there are a two separate issues here. Yep. > the first is the skinning. some pages use the 'white' or jakarta look. > others use the 'blue' or mavenized look. the issue here probably isn't > maven.... Yep. The majority are now mavenised now, so I think it might not be as politically hard as it seems to move to maven l&f. > the second is the way that the site is linked together. maven generated > components don't contain any links back into the commons site or to the > information held there. unless you know how jakarta and the commons is Some do, but not in any kind of uniform way. > organized, it can be hard to work out that a component is part of the > commons and it's even harder to find the common information pertaining to > all projects. non-mavenized components use the jakarta-commons layout and > are much better linked into the whole. > > i wonder whether it might be possible to provide a common (and centrally > maintained) section for the maven generated sidebar which contained links > back into information held on the main commons site. It would be cool, being able to inherit a section into the top of the navigation.xml. I think we need to drop the list of sibling components from the left hand bar in Commons projects. It is getting too large anyway and would mean redeploying the Commons site with each maven site generation, so a bit heavy on a machine/bandwidth. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org