Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 9723 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 18:01:42 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 May 2003 18:01:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 8672 invoked by uid 97); 15 May 2003 18:03:52 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 8665 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 18:03:52 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 15 May 2003 18:03:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 9257 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2003 18:01:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9238 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 18:01:36 -0000 Received: from vpn1.seagullsw.com (HELO atlanta.seagullsw.com) (12.6.96.4) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 May 2003 18:01:36 -0000 Received: by atlanta.seagullsw.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id ; Thu, 15 May 2003 13:46:38 -0400 Message-ID: <245A7290F0E0D311BF6E009027E7908B07204517@atlanta.seagullsw.com> From: Gary Gregory To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' Subject: RE: [codec] Post 1.1 nightly build version number and jar name Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:46:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C31B09.EEB4FC80" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C31B09.EEB4FC80 Content-Type: text/plain Odd, the jar for build of the 15th is still "1.1". When I run the build locally I do get "1.1.1-dev". Also, it would be nice if the commons-codec dir in the zip were commons-codec-1.1.1 instead. Different Jakarta projects do this, others don't, there does not seem to be a hard convention there. Gary -----Original Message----- From: tobrien@transolutions.net [mailto:tobrien@transolutions.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 9:57 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [codec] Post 1.1 nightly build version number and jar name Fixed, 1.1.1-dev will be included in the next nighly build. On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 11:32, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hello codec, > > I'd like to pick the recent bug fix in codec from the nightly build but the > jar built still has the 1.1 string in its name. Since 1.1 has been > "released" should we not bump up the version to a "dev" postfix of some > kind? Perhaps 1.1.1-dev? > > Gary > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C31B09.EEB4FC80--