Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 26962 invoked from network); 26 May 2003 11:59:01 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 May 2003 11:59:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 4365 invoked by uid 97); 26 May 2003 12:01:10 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 4358 invoked from network); 26 May 2003 12:01:09 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 26 May 2003 12:01:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 25589 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2003 11:58:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 25570 invoked from network); 26 May 2003 11:58:46 -0000 Received: from icarus.apache.org (208.185.179.13) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 May 2003 11:58:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 78697 invoked by uid 1304); 26 May 2003 11:58:45 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 May 2003 11:58:45 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 04:58:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Rodney Waldhoff To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [functor] FunctorException? In-Reply-To: <001501c31e33$71ec9000$7700a8c0@tamasz> Message-ID: <20030526045513.J71762@icarus.apache.org> References: <001501c31e33$71ec9000$7700a8c0@tamasz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Personally, I don't see any advantage to "FunctorException extends RuntimeException". Can someone clarify? - Rod On Mon, 19 May 2003, Tomas Viberg wrote: > Hello, > > are there any plans to include a functor-specific exception in the > future? Something like the FunctorException in Collections, so you can > have a common way of handling exceptions raised by the functor methods. > One possibility would be to just copy that class, since it seems to do > what's necessary. > > Regards, > / Tomas > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org