Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 61017 invoked from network); 13 May 2003 12:18:07 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 May 2003 12:18:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 5870 invoked by uid 97); 13 May 2003 12:20:12 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 5863 invoked from network); 13 May 2003 12:20:11 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 13 May 2003 12:20:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 60797 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2003 12:18:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 60785 invoked from network); 13 May 2003 12:18:04 -0000 Received: from spv.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de (134.106.1.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 May 2003 12:18:04 -0000 Received: from sibelius.artis.uni-oldenburg.de ([134.106.121.2]) by spv.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE (Exim 3.16) id 19FYjM-0000xl-00; Tue, 13 May 2003 14:18:04 +0200 Received: from AURELION (really [134.106.121.91]) by sibelius.artis.uni-oldenburg.de via smail with smtp id (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for ; Tue, 13 May 2003 14:17:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <003101c31949$d5240340$5b796a86@AURELION> From: "Mig-O" To: Subject: VFS, Copy & Move Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 14:18:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hello, Is there a reason why copy&move is not impemented in the VFS? Most Filesystems support those actions, and those action are elementary in my eyes. thanks, Daniel Migowski I just write a similar virtual filesystem (not that much supported filesystem types, of course), and the ability to copy files on other servers is really nice. It would even support FXP Transfers in later stages..., and would allow to write really cool file managers. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org