commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Leland <>
Subject Re: validator & inheritance
Date Fri, 23 May 2003 14:13:52 GMT
To add to what David said.

It sounds like you would find this useful, and it sounds very useful to 
me also, so....
I would say start working on it for yourself, work out the concepts, 
based on the
current --released-- validator source code. Just know that you'll likely 
need to make changes to it
to work with the upcoming validator 1.1 release. My guess is that after 
doing a version for validator 1.0.1
source code you'll be able to suggest changes to the validator 1.1 that 
we haven't even thoughtt
of ! So go scratch that itch !!!


Christopher Willingham wrote:

>Are there are any wishes, hopes, or considerations for modifying the
>Validator by adding an extends attribute for inheritance, similar to how
>tiles extends tile definitions?  I use the validator quite a bit; for
>EJB business logic edits, daemon feed edits, standalone edits, & also of
>course struts.  Many of the core edit definitions for a particular
>entity type are the same with some variations.  In fact, within our
>webapp alone we run into situations where an edit suite for a form is
>nearly the same as another yet has a slight twist or difference, thus
>causing a repeat of many edit configurations under a different bean
>name.  Or perhaps there is something like that already built in(wishful
>If no work has been done in this area, I may consider adding such a
>feature if the community here also sees its advantage.  And would be
>willing to consider it for a future release.  If I get positive
>feedback, perhaps one of the original builders could point me in the
>right direction for approaching this task.  It doesn't seem like it
>would be extremely difficult.
>Please share your views!
>Chris Willigham

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message