commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Juozas Baliuka" <bali...@centras.lt>
Subject [commons] New commiter Mark R. Diggory was Re: [VOTE] new commiter Mark R. Diggory
Date Thu, 22 May 2003 19:14:08 GMT
I have counted +5,
please setup account for Mark.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Juozas Baliuka" <baliuka@mwm.lt>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 3:50 PM
Subject: [VOTE] new commiter Mark R. Diggory was Re: [math] (mavenized) web
site is up


> I want to nominate Mark R. Diggory as commons commiter,
> I do not know all of his contributions in commons, but I know he is very
> active on this list for a long time,  has expirence in opensource
> development and
> I know Mark is active in [jelly],  he  needs karma to help develop a new
> project in sandbox ([math])  and we need him too.
>
> +1
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark R. Diggory" <mdiggory@latte.harvard.edu>
> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 11:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [math] (mavenized) web site is up
>
>
> > I hope this wasn't taken wrong, just to be clear, I would in fact, love
> > to be a commiter/developer on the math project.
> >
> > -Mark
> >
> >
> > Mark R. Diggory wrote:
> >
> > > Juozas Baliuka wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> I think it will be better to nominate Mark as commiter, if he wants
to
> > >> develop this stuff, It seems he is active in jelly too.
> > >> Let commit this stuff himself.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Thank you for the recommendation, if I were a commiter though, I'd
> > > want to make sure I was producing changes that were consistent with
> > > the project plans, I'd find it difficult to commit something without
> > > getting full agreement from the primary developers themselves.
> > >
> > > For instance, the last few patches I submitted to math were not
> > > applied because there were significantly different strategies than Tim
> > > was taking in the package architecture, so while there were some parts
> > > of the patches used, the overall patch was rejected. I'd think if I
> > > was a commiter, I'd still need to discuss alot of changes I might add
> > > before doing such, and still need to gain some sort of agreement
> > > before doing such a change.
> > >
> > > -Mark
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message