commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen Colebourne" <scolebou...@btopenworld.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] sandbox karma for "Howard M. Lewis Ship"hlship@apache.org
Date Fri, 30 May 2003 19:37:40 GMT
I agree with Tim, Howard should just be granted karma I believe...
+1 otherwise
Stephen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim O'Brien" <tobrien@discursive.com>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] sandbox karma for "Howard M. Lewis
Ship"hlship@apache.org


> +1, but I'm not really sure if this is a binding vote.  Assume, I'm
> voting as Commons committer *only*.
>
> I'm a little confused, my understanding of the current system is: Any
> Jakarta Committer can simply ask for karma to the sandbox.  Someone like
> Craig usually just makes the appropriate changes to the avail file (or
> so I assume), and the deal is done.
>
> So, Tapestry just navigated the Incubator, and is now a part of
> Jakarta.  Howard is a Jakarta committer, and all he has to do is ask.
> That's straightforward, no PMC vote, no Commons Committer vote needed.
> I believe that someone just needs to give him karma - that would be in
> line with past practices.
>
> The confusing part comes in when someone who is not a Jakarta Committer
> wants access to the commons-sandbox.  I think people just wanted
> non-Jakarta committers to have the approval of the Jakarta PMC before
> being granted karma.  I'm not batting for that "side" per se, but the
> PMC maintains an oversight role for new committers (i.e. requests for
> new accounts come from the PMC) - the "opposition" in this case just
> wants the PMC to have some oversight when a non-Jakarta committer
> requests access.  Does that make any sense?
>
> In Howard's case, he's a Tapestry committer - I don't see the need for a
> vote.
>
>
>
>
>
> (which includes a lot of Ant, DB, James, Maven committers
>
>
> On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 18:57, dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> > +1
> > --
> > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> > Blog:      http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
> > Work:      http://www.multitask.com.au
> >
> >
> > robert burrell donkin <rdonkin@apache.org> wrote on 30/05/2003 07:27:29
> > AM:
> >
> > > Howard M. Lewis Ship (well known as a leading light of the recently
> > > incubated tapestry project) would like access to the commons-sandbox
in
> > > order to work on a new component as outlined below in the following
> > email:
> > >
> > >
> >
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-dev&m=105416555202303&w=2
> > >
> > > i'd like to propose that we grant him karma.
> > >
> > > (i know that the debate about processes is still on going but i
thought
> > > that might as well have an example to talk about ;)
> > >
> > > - robert
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message